On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 08/02/16 16:57, Corneliu ZUZU wrote: > > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/event.h > b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/event.h > > index 11eb1fe..7c2252b 100644 > > --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/event.h > > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/event.h > > @@ -27,9 +27,8 @@ bool_t hvm_event_cr(unsigned int index, unsigned long > value, > > #define hvm_event_crX(what, new, old) \ > > hvm_event_cr(VM_EVENT_X86_##what, new, old) > > void hvm_event_msr(unsigned int msr, uint64_t value); > > -/* Called for current VCPU: returns -1 if no listener */ > > -int hvm_event_int3(unsigned long rip); > > -int hvm_event_single_step(unsigned long rip); > > +int hvm_event_software_breakpoint(unsigned long rip, > > + bool_t single_step); > > Are we liable to ever gain any other type of software breakpoint? Might > it be more sense to pass an enum rather than a bool here? > Exactly what I was thinking, that would make the code somewhat more readable. Tamas
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
