On 2/15/2016 7:47 PM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Corneliu ZUZU <cz...@bitdefender.com
<mailto:cz...@bitdefender.com>> wrote:
On 2/15/2016 10:30 AM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
On 02/15/2016 08:35 AM, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
This patch merges almost identical functions
hvm_event_int3 and
hvm_event_single_step into a single function called
hvm_event_breakpoint.
Also fixes event.c file header comment in the process.
Signed-off-by: Corneliu ZUZU <cz...@bitdefender.com
<mailto:cz...@bitdefender.com>>
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c | 108
+++++++++++++++++++---------------------
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 15 +++---
xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/event.h | 11 ++--
3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com
<mailto:rcojoc...@bitdefender.com>>
Thanks,
Razvan
If the patch hasn't been merged to staging yet then include it. If
it's a longer series the cover page can indicate which patches are
still in need of review and which ones have been already acked.
Furthermore, for each patch under the Signed-off-by tag you can say
what changed in each revision. If nothing changed, you can say no
change or just don't put anything for that revision. See
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg00943.html for
an example. Also keep in mind that if the changes in a revision are
significant enough you can't keep the Acked-by tag on the patch, it
will need to be re-acked.
Tamas
Got it, thanks.
Corneliu.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
