On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:21:22AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 07.03.16 at 11:54, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 03:50:20AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 04.03.16 at 19:25, <dario.faggi...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> > Hello committers, George, > >> > > >> > This is basically a ping for this series, as I think most of it can > >> > actually go in, unless I've missed something. > >> > > >> > So, let me try to recap: > >> > > >> > On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 19:11 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Dario Faggioli (16): > >> >> xen: sched: __runq_tickle takes a useless cpu parameter > >> >> xen: sched: move up the trace record for vcpu_wake and > >> >> vcpu_sleep > >> >> xen: sched: improve domain creation tracing > >> >> xen: credit2: pack trace data better for xentrace_format > >> >> xen: RTDS: pack trace data better for xentrace_format > >> >> xen: sched: tracing: enable TSC tracing for all events > >> >> > >> > Until here, it's in already. > >> > >> And that's the part I could reasonably take care of. I generally avoid > >> committing larger chunks of tools/ stuff, with the expectation that > >> Ian would take deal with those. > >> > > > > Ian is away this week. To avoid having no tools stuff committed this > > whole week, I can prepare a branch for you to pull if you think that's > > OK. > > Well, if these were urgent I'd say yes. But I don't think they are, > so I'd leave it to either Konrad (who has basically asked for what > you offer) if he wants to deal with it, of wait for Ian's return. >
It's not urgent, but I would like to avoid wasting any test cycle. No matter how innocent a patch looks, there is always risk that it breaks something. Konrad, your call. Wei. > Jan > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
