>>> On 18.03.16 at 20:59, <konrad.w...@oracle.com> wrote: > I know I copied and pasted it and I must have done something uncanny. > > Anyhow this is what the change looks like now (I've retained the Reviewed > and Ack as I think this change is mostly cosmetical in nature?)
I think that's okay. > v5: Add Acks, make BUILD_BUG_ON checks look correct. Position the > BUGFRAME_NR properly. Almost, that is. > --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/bug.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/bug.h > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > #define BUGFRAME_bug 2 > #define BUGFRAME_assert 3 > > +#define BUGFRAME_NR 4 > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ The insertion wants to go _before_ the blank line. (And in the ARM case you then may consider removing the preceding blank line too; in any event the ARM and x86 ones should look similar in the end.) Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
