>>> On 25.03.16 at 19:47, <konrad.w...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:14:22AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> 
> Something is off with your patch. This is 5/4 :-)

Well, yes - this got added later on top of the previously sent series,
to make the dependency obvious.

>> Instead of addressing these fields via the base of the stack (which
>> uniformly requires 4-byte displacements), address them from the end
>> (which for everything other than guest_cpu_user_regs requires just
>> 1-byte ones). This yields a code size reduction somewhere between 8k
>> and 12k in my builds.
> 
> Also you made the macro a bit different - the %r is removed.
> 
> Particular reason? 

This is an integral part of the change, so the macro can derive
e.g. both %eax and %rax from the passed argument

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to