The X86_BUG_F00F work around is responsible for fixing up the error
generated on attempted F00F exploitation from an OOPS to a SIGILL.
There is no reason why this code should not be allowed to run on
PV guest on a F00F-affected CPU -- it would simply never trigger.
The pv_enabled() check was there only to avoid printing the f00f
workaround, so removing the check is purely a cosmetic change.

Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcg...@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index f71a34944b56..66509285ffdd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static void intel_workarounds(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
         * The Quark is also family 5, but does not have the same bug.
         */
        clear_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_F00F);
-       if (!paravirt_enabled() && c->x86 == 5 && c->x86_model < 9) {
+       if (c->x86 == 5 && c->x86_model < 9) {
                static int f00f_workaround_enabled;
 
                set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_F00F);
-- 
2.7.2


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to