Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 91226: regressions
- FAIL"):
> This is merlot again! :-/
>
> As said to Wei on IRC, I can try to look into this (i.e., the issues
> with merlot in general), but only next week, after the hackathon.
For now, I think we have concluded that there is no evidence that this
is actually a regression in 4.7 compared to earlier versions of Xen.
It is not clear whether it's a bug which happens to be host-specific,
or an actual bug in the host.
Thanks for offering to investigate.
In the meantime I am going to unbless their equiv-* so that they won't
be used for these pair tests. If after this we see further problems,
we can consider stronger measures.
Thanks,
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
