On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:55:33AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 21.04.16 at 10:36, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On 11/03/16 16:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> In that case (with the new value being held in, or now in one case cast
> >> to, a 32-bit variable) there's no need to go through the long mode part
> >> of the checks.
> >>
> >> Primarily this was meant to hopefully address Coverity ID 1355278, but
> >> since the change produces smaller code as well I think we should use it
> >> even if it doesn't help that (benign) warning.
> >>
> >> Also it's more in line with jmp_rel() for commit_far_branch() to do the
> >> _regs.eip update, so adjust that at once.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
> 
> Wei,
> 
> considering that this at least attempts to address a Coverity issue,
> I'd like to ask for this to be considered to be allowed in despite
> being past code freeze.
> 
> Thanks, Jan
> 

Release-acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to