On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 09:31 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > So, I guess I don't really undertstand the case for / desire to > > > relicense tools/libvchan/libxenvchan.h, especially given that the > > > other > > > tools/libvchan/*.[ch] files don't appear to be being relicensed > > > in [0]. > Just consistency.
I'd say it introduces a (far) bigger inconsistency than it avoids. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
