On June 12, 2016 2:56 PM, Tian, Kevin <kevin.t...@intel.com> wrote: > > From: Julien Grall [mailto:julien.gr...@arm.com] > > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 8:40 PM > > > > Hi Jan, > > > > On 09/06/16 13:32, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>>> On 09.06.16 at 14:24, <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote: > > >> So the behavior of iommu_iotlb_flush is up to the IOMMU driver. > > >> Whilst the behavior of iommu_{,un}map_page are defined by the > common code. > > > > > > I'm certainly up for moving the logic up to the generic IOMMU layer, > > > if that's feasible. > > > > That would be my preference. > > > > I suppose above comment is for "[Patch v11 0/3] VT-d Device-TLB flush > issue", where the crash logic better be moved up.
I think so too. however, I am still reading these AMD/ARM related code. > Do you have further against > on this patch then? Quan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
