Hi Julien,
On 07/06/2016 04:28 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > > > On 05/07/16 21:21, Sergej Proskurin wrote: >> I agree on this point as well. However, we should maybe think of another >> name for flush_tlb_domain. Especially, if we do not flush the entire >> domain (including all currently active altp2m views). What do you think? > > This function is only used within p2m.c, although it is exported. What > about renaming this function to flush_tlb_p2m and instead pass the p2m > in parameter? > > Regards, > That sounds good to me :) I will do that. Thank you. Cheers, ~Sergej _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
