On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 01:34:27PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 22/07/16 13:04, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > The ASSERT() made effective by b5b5876619bd8ec2e
> > ("xen: credit2: fix two s_time_t handling issues
> > in load balancing") triggers for b_avgload (spotted
> > by OSSTest).
> >
> > b_avgload is where we store the prediction of how
> > the load of a runqueue will look like in the medium
> > to long term, because of a vcpu being added to or
> > removed from there.
> >
> > On vcpu removal, saturate down b_avgload to zero,
> > as it makes very few sense to predict that the
> > load of a runqueue will at some point become negative!
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com>
>
> Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com>
>
> Wei, do you want to apply it?
>
I will apply it with your ack.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
