>>> On 09.08.16 at 09:39, <yu.c.zh...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 8/8/2016 11:40 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 12.07.16 at 11:02, <yu.c.zh...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> + rc = -ENOENT;
>>> + list_for_each_entry ( s,
>>> + &d->arch.hvm_domain.ioreq_server.list,
>>> + list_entry )
>>> + {
>>> + if ( s == d->arch.hvm_domain.default_ioreq_server )
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + if ( s->id == id )
>>> + {
>>> + rc = p2m_set_ioreq_server(d, flags, s);
>>> + if ( rc == 0 )
>>> + dprintk(XENLOG_DEBUG, "%u %s type HVMMEM_ioreq_server.\n",
>>> + s->id, (flags != 0) ? "mapped to" : "unmapped
>>> from");
>> Is this really useful?
>
> Sorry, are you referring to this debug message?
> I believe it helps, especially when multiple ioreq servers are
> claiming/disclaiming their ownership of
> the HVMMEM_ioreq_server. :)
Well, that's a configuration bug anyway right now, so I'm not really
with you. But in the end it'll be Paul to judge ...
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
