>>> On 22.08.16 at 14:47, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: > Coverity complains: > > overflow_before_widen: Potentially overflowing expression > info->nr_modules * 32U with type unsigned int (32 bits, unsigned) is > evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic, and then used in a context that > expects an expression of type uint64_t (64 bits, unsigned). > > The overflow is unlikely to happen in reality because we only expect a > few modules. > > Fix that by converting the check to use bound checking to placate > Coverity. > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
