> ...snip.. > > > + case R_AARCH64_ABS32: > > > + ovf = reloc_data(RELOC_OP_ABS, dest, val, 32); > > > + break; > > > > I have noticed that not all the relocations are implemented (e.g > > R_AARCH64_ABS16, R_AARCH64_MOVW_*...). I don't think there is anything > > preventing the compiler to use them. So is there any particular reasons to > > not include them? > > I followed the same principle Ross did on x86 - only implement the ones that > the compiler has generated. And that is what I initially had in the v1, but > expanded > it per request. > > I can include more, but at what point should I stop?
xen/arch/arm/arm64/livepatch.c | 140 +++++++ xen/include/xen/elfstructs.h | 23 ++ lines later and I added them all in. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
