Thank you all very much for the feedback. I will address them in the next version.
> > Did you go through and check that there is nothing this information > > can already get derived from? I can't immediately point you at > > anything, but it feels like there should. > > > Indeed. And if there isn't and we need to do add our own flagging, > isn't there a better way and place where to put it (e.g., what Juergen > and Andrew are hinting at)? I prefer that to derive whether guest boot finishes is neither limited to a specific domain type (pv, hvm, pvhvm or pvh) nor a specific arch (i386, x86_64, arm32, arm64 or more in the future). Ideally, I would have one or a combo of fields belong to "struct domain" but there isn't. Can we use the field in vcpu[0]? How about domain->vcpu[0]->last_run_time? The only line of code updating the field is in function "schedule": 1411 prev->last_run_time = now; I am afraid if there would be any existing (I did not find one) or future interfaces that can reset the entire vcpu[0] to 0. Dongli Zhang _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
