Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] ipxe: update to newer
> That was eventually done. I'm not sure exactly when the change was
> made. Does gcc -Wno-foo work properly on all the gcc's we care about ?
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] ipxe: update to newer
> Just fyi I have run into an issue with -Wno-override-init use in Linux
> 4.8 on gcc 4.1.x, so what you say doesn't appear to hold for all gcc
> versions we permit to be used.
Well, that answers my question above.
I think the right approach is to:
* Test -Wno-this-is-not-a-warning-option. If gcc accepts it,
add -Wno-something to disable the nonnull check·
* Review the misleading indentations and if there are only a few, fix
them in a downstream patch. Or, if there are many, decide to
Xen-devel mailing list