On 27/10/16 17:00, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 27/10/16 15:56, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 27.10.16 at 11:55, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> + /* Offset behind list: just return a list with an empty string. */ >>> + if (off >= node->childlen) { >> >> Is it perhaps worth separating the == and > cases? The former is >> just EOL, while the latter is really an error. > > Hmm, yes. I'll modify it.
On a second thought: this might be the result of a concurrent child removal. So the caller would have no chance to avoid this situation, but he would see a different generation count in the response. I think I leave it as it is. Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
