On 11/11/16 15:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 11.11.16 at 16:16, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:50:24AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> Currently hypervisor provides PV guest's CPUID(1).EBX[31:24] (initial
>>> APIC ID) with contents of that field on the processor that launched
>>> the guest. This results in the guest reporting different initial
>>> APIC IDs across runs.
>>>
>>> We should be consistent in how this value is reported, let's set
>>> it to 0 (which is also what Linux guests expect).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com>
>> I will defer this to x86 maintainers.
> Changing from a random (wrong) value to a deterministic (but still
> wrong) value certainly won't make things worse. IOW the patch
> can have my ack if needed, but I thought I had seen Andrew
> already give his.

I don't think I had explicitly, but here...

Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to