On 15/11/2016 13:45, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
>On 15/11/16 13:35, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> On 11/15/2016 01:17 AM, Wei Liu wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:52:27PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>>> There is no reason to build, for example, dsdt_pvh.asl for hvmloader. >>>>We >>>> pass which DSDTs to build via DSDT_FILES parameter. >>>> >>>> If DSDT_FILES is empty all DSDTs for a particular architecture will >>>>be built. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> >>> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> >>> >>> This doesn't seem to be strictly necessary for 4.8 though. >> Right. >> >> In fact, I'd argue that even the first patch could wait until after 4.8 >> is out given that we are quite late in RC cycle now and it is not fixing >> any bugs. > >Patch 1 should definitely be taken into 4.8, so we don't end up with one >release of Xen with a dual-licensed libacpi. +1 Lars _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel