On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 14:28 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > On 09/11/16 22:50, Anastassios Nanos wrote: > > > Example of features that could be discussed: > > > - Sharing co-processor between guests > > > - PCI passthrough > > > > Another issue to discuss, at some point, could be big.LITTLE > > support > > (based on https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016 > > -09/msg01802.html). > > Good point. > Good point indeed. If that will be on the agenda, I'd like to be in the call, if possible.
> Looking at the discussion, many ideas was suggested and I > don't remember whether we all agreed on what to do. I would recommend > to > summarize the discussion in a mail so we can come up with an > agreement. > > Peng, would you be up to do this? > Yep, that would help a lot! :-) > Regards, > -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
