This is a first (of three, as far as current plans go) steps to do away
with misleading register names (eax instead of rax).

01: x86/MSR: introduce MSR access split/fold helpers
02: x86/guest-walk: use unambiguous register names
03: x86/shadow: use unambiguous register names
04: x86/oprofile: use unambiguous register names
05: x86/HVM: use unambiguous register names
06: x86/HVMemul: use unambiguous register names
07: x86/SVM: use unambiguous register names
(VMX counterpart omitted for now, as I'll need to re-base)
08: x86/vm-event: use unambiguous register names
09: x86/traps: use unambiguous register names
10: x86/misc: use unambiguous register names

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to