On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:29:44AM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > These are the minutes I took during the call: > > Xen PV Drivers Lifecycle document ready to be committed. > > Common Pitfalls for new PV protocols: > - 32 vs 64 fields > - not Linux centric > - missing version fields and feature flags > > Full list of outstanding PV protocols: > pvcalls, xen-9pfs, multitouch events, sound, display, netfront/netback > extension > > PVCalls: should be OK to move forward, Konrad will review next > Sound: should be OK to move forward, Konrad will review next > Display: concerns about whether it will replace xenfb. Konrad will take > a look after > Multitouch: new, but simple, Stefano will review > Netfront/netback extension: new, still many comments outstanding, > probably not for the next release > > Things to do > - use pahole 32 bit and 64 bit to check the structs, publish the output > on xendevel
Sorry, I wasn't able to attend the call, but didn't we agree that all new protocols would be described using binary layouts instead of C structs? Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
