>>> On 17.01.17 at 18:14, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: > This can be solved by using a different ACPI name in order to describe vCPUs > in > the ACPI namespace. Most hardware vendors tend to use CPU or PR prefixes for > the processor objects, so using a 'VP' (ie: Virtual Processor) prefix should > prevent clashes.
I continue to think that this is insufficient, without seeing a nice clean way to solve the issue properly. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
