At 01:13 -0700 on 15 Feb (1487121231), Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 14.02.17 at 18:35, <t...@xen.org> wrote:
> > At 06:37 -0700 on 13 Feb (1486967832), Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 13.02.17 at 14:19, <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote:
> >> > -    tss = mem_alloc(128, 128);
> >> > -    memset(tss, 0, 128);
> >> > +    tss = mem_alloc(TSS_SIZE, TSS_SIZE);
> >> 
> >>     tss = mem_alloc(TSS_SIZE, 128);
> >> 
> >> is sufficient here, as I've noticed (only) while reviewing Roger's
> >> series v4 of which did trigger the creation of this patch. I've made
> >> the change locally for now.
> > 
> > Should Xen check the alignment when the param gets written?
> 
> I did think about this too, but then decided not to, since the guest
> would only shoot itself in the foot (the more that in non-root mode
> no actual task switching by the hardware occurs, so the alignment
> requirement is pretty theoretical anyway).

Righto.

Tim.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to