On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 01:27:34PM +0000, Paul Durrant wrote:
> Checking the value of xch->xcall is clearly incorrect. The code should be
> checking xch->fmem (i.e. the return of the previously called function).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com>

Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>

Ian, please backport this.

> ---
> Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com>
> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>
> ---
>  tools/libxc/xc_private.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_private.c b/tools/libxc/xc_private.c
> index f0e089c..9df6925 100644
> --- a/tools/libxc/xc_private.c
> +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_private.c
> @@ -64,8 +64,7 @@ struct xc_interface_core 
> *xc_interface_open(xentoollog_logger *logger,
>          goto err;
>  
>      xch->fmem = xenforeignmemory_open(xch->error_handler, 0);
> -
> -    if ( xch->xcall == NULL )
> +    if ( xch->fmem == NULL )
>          goto err;
>  
>      return xch;
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to