On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 02:35 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > I would have wanted to commit this (and then also patch 5), but it > depends on earlier patches (possibly just trivially, but I didn't > want > to chance it). Considering this is (aiui) a bug fix, it would of > course > have been nice if this was at the start of the series, to ease > backporting (if desired or even necessary). > I think you are right. I usually do put bugfixes at the top but, for some reasons, I wasn't considering these two patches as backport candidates.
But indeed they're fixes, and indeed they qualify. I'll resend the series with this one and patch 5 as the first two patches. George (and everyone else): please ignore this, and look directly at v4. Sorry for the inconvenience. Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
