On 11/23/2017 11:11 AM, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi George, > > On 22/11/17 19:20, George Dunlap wrote: >> Hardware support and guest type. >> >> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com> >> --- >> Changes since v2: >> - Moved SMMUv* into generic IOMMU section >> >> CC: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@citrix.com> >> CC: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> >> CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> >> CC: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> >> CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org> >> CC: Konrad Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com> >> CC: Tim Deegan <t...@xen.org> >> CC: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com> >> --- >> SUPPORT.md | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/SUPPORT.md b/SUPPORT.md >> index a4cf2da50d..5945ab4926 100644 >> --- a/SUPPORT.md >> +++ b/SUPPORT.md >> @@ -22,6 +22,14 @@ for the definitions of the support status levels etc. >> Status: Supported >> +### ARM v7 + Virtualization Extensions >> + >> + Status: Supported >> + >> +### ARM v8 >> + >> + Status: Supported >> + >> ## Host hardware support >> ### Physical CPU Hotplug >> @@ -35,6 +43,7 @@ for the definitions of the support status levels etc. >> ### Host ACPI (via Domain 0) >> Status, x86 PV: Supported >> + Status, ARM: Experimental >> ### x86/Intel Platform QoS Technologies >> @@ -44,6 +53,14 @@ for the definitions of the support status levels >> etc. >> Status, AMD IOMMU: Supported >> Status, Intel VT-d: Supported >> + Status, ARM SMMUv1: Supported >> + Status, ARM SMMUv2: Supported >> + >> +### ARM/GICv3 ITS >> + >> + Status: Experimental >> + >> +Extension to the GICv3 interrupt controller to support MSI. >> ## Guest Type >> @@ -67,12 +84,18 @@ Requires hardware virtualisation support (Intel >> VMX / AMD SVM) >> Status: Supported >> -PVH is a next-generation paravirtualized mode >> +PVH is a next-generation paravirtualized mode > > I am not sure to see the difference between the 2 lines. Is it intented?
The difference is the whitespace at the end -- this change should have been made in the previous patch instead. > The rest looks good. Thanks. With that moved, can it have your Ack? -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel