On 06/12/17 13:04, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On 12/06/2017 12:58 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 06.12.17 at 12:47, <julien.gr...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> On 12/06/2017 11:45 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>>> On 06.12.17 at 10:47, <julien.gr...@linaro.org> wrote: >>>>> I guess I have been CCed because you would like this patch is >>>>> fixing the >>>>> regression you mentioned on IRC? >>>> >>>> Yes, but first of all we need to see whether the issue goes away in >>>> master once the patch is in. >>> >>> Would reverting the offending patch in Xen 4.10 be solution? >> >> Probably yes, at the price of re-introducing the issue that change >> did fix. But reverting wouldn't feel right: The change, after all, >> was not buggy - it merely uncovered the other issue, as far as we >> can tell. > > I understand. I have seen you pushed the fixes in master today. Let > see how it perform and decide tomorrow what to do.
XenServer testing has identified this bug, and shown the bug to be fixed with this patch in place. Therefore, a retroactive Tested-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> No other emulation issues seen running windows on this particular piece of old AMD hardware. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
