On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 02:29:08AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 08.02.18 at 13:25, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com>
> A change like this should not come without description, providing a
> reason for the change. Otherwise how will someone wanting to
> understand the change in a couple of years actually be able to
> make any sense of it. This is in particular because I continue to be
> not fully convinced that white listing is appropriate in the Dom0
> case (and for the record I'm similarly unconvinced that black listing
> is the best choice, yet obviously we need to pick on of the two).
I'm sorry, I thought we agreed at the summit to convert this to
whitelisting because it was likely better to simply not expose unknown
ACPI tables to guests.
I guess the commit message could be something like:
"The following list of whitelisted APIC tables are either known to work
or don't require any resources to be mapped in either the IO or the
This list is expected to be expanded as more testing is performed."
Xen-devel mailing list