>>> On 13.02.18 at 16:15, <blacksk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've updated the comments according to your previous suggestions,
> do they look good to you?

The one in the public header is way too verbose. I specifically don't
see why you would need to spell out XSM privilege requirements
there. Please make new comments match existing ones in style and
verbosity if at all possible, while still conveying all necessary /
relevant information.


Xen-devel mailing list

Reply via email to