On 19/02/18 11:16, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 19/02/18 10:47, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: >> On 24/01/18 16:26, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com> wrote: >>>> On 24/01/18 16:07, George Dunlap wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Boris Ostrovsky >>>>> <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 01/24/2018 07:06 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>>>>> On 24/01/18 11:54, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:42:39AM +0000, George Dunlap wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Boris Ostrovsky >>>>>>>>> <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 01/18/2018 05:33 AM, Wei Liu wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:31:32AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Wei, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 01/12/17 15:14, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Instead of locating the RSDP table below 1MB put it just below 4GB >>>>>>>>>>>>> like the rest of the ACPI tables in case of PVH guests. This will >>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid punching more holes than necessary into the memory map. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mind applying this one? >>>>>>>>>>> Don't worry, it is in my queue. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Will come to this and other patches I accumulated soon. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Wei. >>>>>>>>>> This requires kernel changes, doesn't it? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-12/msg00714.html >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And this series apparently never made it to the tree. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> PVH guests are broken now on staging. >>>>>>>>> And the Linux side of PVH is officially supported now, right? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> AFAIK PVH is still considered a tech preview --- Linux or Xen. >>>>> >>>>> From SUPPORT.md: >>>>> >>>>> ### x86/PVH guest >>>>> >>>>> Status: Supported >>>>> >>>>> I was under the impression that PVH guest in Linux was complete and >>>>> stable as of Linux 4.11. If that's not true it should have been >>>>> brought up during the 4.10 development cycle, where we declared PVH >>>>> domUs as "supported". >>>> >>>> So what is the problem here? >>>> >>>> - current Linux can't be booted as PVH guest with xen-unstable due to >>>> a bug in Linux, patches for Linux are being worked on >>>> - booting Linux as PVH guest with xen 4.10 is working >>> >>> I was responding to Boris's claim that PVH is considered tech preview. >>> I can't say anything one way or the other about PVH in Linux, but PVH >>> in Xen is definitely now considered supported. >>> >>> My subsequent response to Roger ("FWIW I can buy this argument") was >>> meant to indicate I didn't have any more objection to the approach you >>> guys were planning on taking. >>> >>> -George >> >> L.S., >> >> Seems I lost track, is there any progress on this issue ? >> (doesn't seem a fix has landed in 4.16-rc2 yet). > > Just sent a new patch series.
Just tested and it works fine here. -- Sander > > Juergen > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
