>>> On 02.03.18 at 15:36, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 07:31:43AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 02.03.18 at 15:22, <dunl...@umich.edu> wrote:
>> > I'd be in favor of merging the 4.8.3pre-shim-comet and
>> > 4.10.0-shim-comet branches into staging-4.8 and staging-4.10
>> > respectively (assuming that's suitable).  Are there any other fixes to
>> > PVH / PVshim hosting that we'd need to backport as well?
>> That depends on how well those branches have been maintained
>> wrt fixes posted / applied during the last couple of weeks.
> I can cherry-pick relevant fixes to 4.10-comet and then merge 4.10-comet
> with 4.10 staging.

Fine with me.

> If that's agreed we can discuss on what criteria do patches get picked
> for backporting.

Until we've shipped a stable version from those branches (to be honest
I'm not sure about doing this for 4.8 when we don#t mean to do it for
4.9), I think this can be a little relaxed. Later the criteria should match
that of other changes going into stable.


Xen-devel mailing list

Reply via email to