On 03/12/2018 03:26 PM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > On 19/02/18 22:13, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: >> On 19/02/18 11:16, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> On 19/02/18 10:47, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: >>>> On 24/01/18 16:26, George Dunlap wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 24/01/18 16:07, George Dunlap wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Boris Ostrovsky >>>>>>> <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 01/24/2018 07:06 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 24/01/18 11:54, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:42:39AM +0000, George Dunlap wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Boris Ostrovsky >>>>>>>>>>> <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 01/18/2018 05:33 AM, Wei Liu wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:31:32AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wei, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 01/12/17 15:14, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instead of locating the RSDP table below 1MB put it just below >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4GB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like the rest of the ACPI tables in case of PVH guests. This >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid punching more holes than necessary into the memory map. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mind applying this one? >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't worry, it is in my queue. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Will come to this and other patches I accumulated soon. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Wei. >>>>>>>>>>>> This requires kernel changes, doesn't it? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-12/msg00714.html >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And this series apparently never made it to the tree. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> PVH guests are broken now on staging. >>>>>>>>>>> And the Linux side of PVH is officially supported now, right? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> AFAIK PVH is still considered a tech preview --- Linux or Xen. >>>>>>> From SUPPORT.md: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ### x86/PVH guest >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Status: Supported >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was under the impression that PVH guest in Linux was complete and >>>>>>> stable as of Linux 4.11. If that's not true it should have been >>>>>>> brought up during the 4.10 development cycle, where we declared PVH >>>>>>> domUs as "supported". >>>>>> So what is the problem here? >>>>>> >>>>>> - current Linux can't be booted as PVH guest with xen-unstable due to >>>>>> a bug in Linux, patches for Linux are being worked on >>>>>> - booting Linux as PVH guest with xen 4.10 is working >>>>> I was responding to Boris's claim that PVH is considered tech preview. >>>>> I can't say anything one way or the other about PVH in Linux, but PVH >>>>> in Xen is definitely now considered supported. >>>>> >>>>> My subsequent response to Roger ("FWIW I can buy this argument") was >>>>> meant to indicate I didn't have any more objection to the approach you >>>>> guys were planning on taking. >>>>> >>>>> -George >>>> L.S., >>>> >>>> Seems I lost track, is there any progress on this issue ? >>>> (doesn't seem a fix has landed in 4.16-rc2 yet). >>> Just sent a new patch series. >> Just tested and it works fine here. > Hi Juergen, > > I don't know by which tree those patches should arrive at Linus, > so i can't check if they fell through the cracks somewhere, but 4.16-rc5 > hasn't got them yet. >
I was just about to send this exact question. Last I saw a note from Ingo that he put it in tip:x86/boot (https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/11/358) but I don't see it there. (And I'd think it would have been pulled by Linus by now anyway) -boris _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
