On 13/07/2021 09:08, Jan Beulich wrote: > Oddly enough in the original report Coverity only complained about the > native hypercall related switch() statements. Now that it has seen those > fixed, it complains about (only HVM) compat ones. Hence the CIDs below > are all for the HVM side of things, yet while at it take care of the PV > side as well. > > Coverity-ID: 1487105, 1487106, 1487107, 1487108, 1487109. > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
