On Wed, 2021-09-22 at 13:58 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 22/09/2021 08:01, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > Agreed. Whether the truncation is an issue in practice is > > questionable, > > as I wouldn't expect budget to be consumed in multiple-second > > individual > > steps. But I didn't check whether this scheduler might allow a vCPU > > to > > run for this long all in one go. > > I expect it's marginal too. > It is indeed.
> Honestly, its not a bug I care to fix right > about now. I could leave a /* TODO: truncation? */ in place so > whomever > encounters weird behaviour from this trace record has a bit more help > of > where to look? > Sure, that's fine for me. Thanks and Regards -- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D http://about.me/dario.faggioli Virtualization Software Engineer SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- <<This happens because _I_ choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
