On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:06:54AM +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > On 03/23/2018 10:27 AM, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> > > --- > > Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> > > Cc: George Dunlap <george.dun...@eu.citrix.com> > > Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> > > Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > > Cc: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com> > > Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com> > > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org> > > Cc: Tim Deegan <t...@xen.org> > > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> > > --- > > SUPPORT.md | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/SUPPORT.md b/SUPPORT.md > > index ddcdfab5ad..fb0151aa7b 100644 > > --- a/SUPPORT.md > > +++ b/SUPPORT.md > > @@ -96,6 +96,30 @@ Requires hardware virtualisation support (Intel VMX / > > AMD SVM) > > > > ARM only has one guest type at the moment > > > > +## Domain 0 Type > > + > > +### x86/PV Dom0 > > + > > + Status: Supported > > + > > +Traditional Xen PV Domain 0 > > + > > +No hardware requirements > > + > > +### x86/PVH Dom0 > > + > > + Status: Experimental > > + > > +PVH based Domain 0 > > + > > +Requires CPU hardware virtualization extensions and an IOMMU. > > + > > +### ARM Dom0 > > + > > + Status: Supported > > + > > +ARM only has one Domain 0 type at the moment > > + > > There's a lot of redundancy here. What about keeping the guest types > together, like the following? > > --- > ### x86/PVH > > Status, domU: Supported > Status, dom0: Experimental > > [description] > > Note also that dom0 support requires IOMMU or VT-d hardware.
Sure. I wasn't aware that we could use 'Status, XXX:'. Somehow I thought this won't be processed correctly, but there are bunch of entries using this format already. Let me send v2. Thanks, Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
