On 01.10.2021 01:00, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 30 Sep 2021, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote: >> From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <[email protected]> >> >> We need to pass info about maximum supported guest address >> space size to the toolstack on Arm in order to properly >> calculate the base and size of the extended region (safe range) >> for the guest. The extended region is unused address space which >> could be safely used by domain for foreign/grant mappings on Arm. >> The extended region itself will be handled by the subsequents >> patch. >> >> Use p2m_ipa_bits variable on Arm, the x86 equivalent is >> hap_paddr_bits. >> >> As we change the size of structure bump the interface version. >> >> Suggested-by: Julien Grall <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <[email protected]> >> Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]>
I have to admit that I'm a little puzzled to see these R-b-s when ... >> Please note, that review comments for the RFC version [1] haven't been >> addressed yet. >> It is not forgotten, some clarification is needed. It will be addressed for >> the next version. >> >> [1] >> https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/[email protected]/ ... Oleksandr makes clear this patch isn't really ready yet. The tags could misguide a committer into putting in this series despite the open issue(s). Jan
