On 16.11.2021 05:42, osstest service owner wrote: > flight 166151 linux-linus real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/166151/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > build-i386-pvops 6 kernel-build fail REGR. vs. > 165976
I'm puzzled by this in two ways: First that this is being done at all, when 32-bit PV Xen support has gone away several releases back. If the purpose is to cover PVH and/or HVM, then I guess the test name has become misleading. And second that this fails on a KVM related build error: arch/x86/kvm/x86.c: In function ‘vcpu_enter_guest’: arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:9948:1: error: unsupported size for integer register } ^ make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:287: arch/x86/kvm/x86.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... To limit the risk of unrelated build breakage, wouldn't it make sense to keep off Kconfig settings which aren't really of interest? > test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 165976 > test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 165976 > test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 165976 > test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 165976 > test-armhf-armhf-xl 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 165976 > test-armhf-armhf-examine 8 reboot fail REGR. vs. > 165976 > test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 165976 > test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit1 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 165976 > test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 165976 > test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 165976 For these I assume Arm folks are aware and will look into the cause. At a first glance it seems to be the NIC driver which is unhappy. Jan
