On 18/11/2021 11:14, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 18 Nov 2021, at 10:37, Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:01:08AM +0000, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 18 Nov 2021, at 08:58, Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 02:07:50PM +0000, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 17 Nov 2021, at 09:53, Roger Pau Monne <roger....@citrix.com> wrote:
Document some of the relevant changes during the 4.16 release cycle,
likely more entries are missing.
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com>
---
CHANGELOG.md | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md
index ad1a8c2bc2..8b0bdd9cf0 100644
--- a/CHANGELOG.md
+++ b/CHANGELOG.md
@@ -21,6 +21,17 @@ The format is based on [Keep a
Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/)
- qemu-traditional based device models (both, qemu-traditional and
ioemu-stubdom) will
no longer be built per default. In order to be able to use those, configure
needs to
be called with "--enable-qemu-traditional" as parameter.
+ - Fixes for credit2 scheduler stability in corner case conditions.
+ - Ongoing improvements in the hypervisor build system.
+ - vtpmmgr miscellaneous fixes in preparation for TPM 2.0 support.
+ - 32bit PV guests only supported in shim mode.
+ - Improved PVH dom0 debug key handling.
+ - Fix booting on some Intel systems without a PIT (i8254).
Missing:
- cpu ID sanitization on arm64
- fix 32/64bit vreg emulation on arm64
Can I get a bit more information about those items? Just a pointer to
the commit messages would be helpful so that I can try to write a more
comprehensive entry (or maybe it's just me not knowing anything about
Arm that fails to understand it).
I agree, the text is not quite clear, I will try to come with a better one.
In the meantime here is are links to the series:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/xen-devel/list/?series=535805&state=*
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/xen-devel/list/?series=477151&archive=both
Thanks. I've added:
- CPU feature leveling on arm64 platform with heterogeneous cores.
Yes
- Handle register accesses as 32/64bit on Arm depending on the processor
bitness.
I would say:
- Fix coprocessor register accesses on Arm to use the proper 32/64bit access
size.
I would suggest s/coprocessor/system/ because the changes was targeting
arm64.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall