On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> @@ -95,10 +102,25 @@ int vpci_add_handlers(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdev->vpci->handlers);
> spin_lock_init(&pdev->vpci->lock);
>
> + header = &pdev->vpci->header;
> + for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(header->bars); i++ )
> + {
> + struct vpci_bar *bar = &header->bars[i];
> +
> + bar->mem = rangeset_new(NULL, NULL, 0);
I don't recall why an anonymous range set was chosen back at the time
when vPCI was first implemented, but I think this needs to be changed
now that DomU-s get supported. Whether you do so right here or in a
prereq patch is secondary to me. It may be desirable to exclude them
from rangeset_domain_printk() (which would likely require a new
RANGESETF_* flag), but I think such resources should be associated
with their domains.
Jan
