Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.16] Revert "x86/CPUID: shrink
max_{,sub}leaf fields according to actual leaf contents""):
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.16] Revert "x86/CPUID: shrink
> max_{,sub}leaf fields according to actual leaf contents""):
> > While not strictly needed with Roger having given his already,
> > Acked-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
> > to signal my (basic) agreement with the course of action taken.
> > Nevertheless I fear this is going to become yet one more case where
> > future action is promised, but things then die out.
> >
> > Ian - I guess all this now needs is your R-a.
>
> Thanks everyone. Yes.
>
> For the record,
>
> Release-Acked-by: Ian Jackson <[email protected]>
>
> I will commit it myself now.
Reviewing the thread, there was some discussion over the commit
message. It wasn't clear to me whether there was still a change
intended.
I decided not to wait for 4.16, so I have committed it there as-is.
The commit message is less important there as it won't end up in most
archeaology.
When the discussion about the commit message has converged, please
would someone commit the patch to staging too.
Thanks,
Ian.
