On 28.01.2022 02:38, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > --- a/xen/common/event_channel.c > +++ b/xen/common/event_channel.c > @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ void evtchn_free(struct domain *d, struct evtchn *chn) > xsm_evtchn_close_post(chn); > } > > -static int evtchn_alloc_unbound(evtchn_alloc_unbound_t *alloc) > +int evtchn_alloc_unbound(evtchn_alloc_unbound_t *alloc, bool disable_xsm)
Nit: I don't think "disable" expresses the behavior. May I suggest "skip" or "bypass" or some such? Or invert the boolean and name it "check_xsm" or even simply "xsm"? Jan
