On 15.02.2022 12:54, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > On 15.02.22 13:50, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 15.02.2022 12:45, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: >>> I'm on your side, I just want to hear that we all agree pcidevs >>> needs to be converted into rwlock according with the plan you >>> suggested and at least now it seems to be an acceptable solution. >> I'd like to express worries though about the conversion of this >> recursive lock into an r/w one. > Could you please elaborate more on this?
Not sure what to say beyond the obvious: At the time of the conversion, there certainly was an issue to be solved. You'd need to solve this issue differently then. Plus you'd need to make sure that no further incarnations of the original issue had been there or have been added in the meantime. Jan
