On 02.03.2022 23:11, Andrew Cooper wrote: > This makes it behave slightly more like a regular boolean option. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> > Slightly RFC, because there is no easy way of making the opposite "normal > boolean" case work for no-vpmu. There's nothing to do to make this work afaict: Generic command line handling converts "no-<option>" to "<option>=no" for custom params. Jan
