> On 8 Mar 2022, at 19:46, Vikram Garhwal <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Protect iommu_add_dt_device() with dtdevs_lock to prevent concurrent access 
> add.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vikram Garhwal <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Luca Fancellu <[email protected]>

> ---
> xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c 
> b/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c
> index b3b04f8e03..776809a8f2 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c
> @@ -145,6 +145,8 @@ int iommu_add_dt_device(struct dt_device_node *np)
>     if ( dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev) )
>         return 0;
> 
> +    spin_lock(&dtdevs_lock);
> +
>     /*
>      * According to the Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/iommu.txt
>      * from Linux.
> @@ -157,7 +159,10 @@ int iommu_add_dt_device(struct dt_device_node *np)
>          * these callback implemented.
>          */
>         if ( !ops->add_device || !ops->dt_xlate )
> -            return -EINVAL;
> +        {
> +            rc = -EINVAL;
> +            goto fail;
> +        }
> 
>         if ( !dt_device_is_available(iommu_spec.np) )
>             break;
> @@ -188,6 +193,8 @@ int iommu_add_dt_device(struct dt_device_node *np)
>     if ( rc < 0 )
>         iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
> 
> +fail:
> +    spin_unlock(&dtdevs_lock);
>     return rc;
> }
> 
> 


Reply via email to