On 22.06.2022 13:09, Michal Orzel wrote:
> On 22.06.2022 12:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.06.2022 09:02, Michal Orzel wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/drivers/acpi/tables/tbutils.c
>>> +++ b/xen/drivers/acpi/tables/tbutils.c
>>> @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ acpi_tb_parse_root_table(acpi_physical_address
>>> rsdp_address, u8 flags)
>>> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>>> ACPI_WARNING((AE_INFO,
>>> "Truncating %u table entries!",
>>> - (unsigned)
>>> + (unsigned int)
>>> (acpi_gbl_root_table_list.size -
>>> acpi_gbl_root_table_list.
>>> count)));
>>
>> Same here then, except PRIu32 wouldn't be correct to use in this case.
>>
> Why is it so given that both size and count are of type u32?
Because the promoted type (i.e. the type of the result of the subtraction)
isn't uint32_t (and will never be). It'll be "unsigned int" when
sizeof(int) == 4 (and in this case it'll happen to alias uint32_t) and
just "int" when sizeof(int) > 4 (not even aliasing int32_t).
Jan
