On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 09:56:34AM +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 23 Jun 2022, at 08:43, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On 09.06.2022 17:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> While mail hasn't been bouncing, Daniel has not been responding to patch
> >> submissions or otherwise interacting with the community for several
> >> years. Move maintainership to THE REST in kind of an unusual way, with
> >> the goal to avoid
> >> - orphaning the component,
> >> - repeating all THE REST members here,
> >> - removing the entry altogether.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
> >> ---
> >> We hope this to be transient, with a new maintainer to be established
> >> rather sooner than later.
> >> 
> >> I realize the way I'm expressing this may upset scripts/*_maintainer*.pl,
> >> so I'd welcome any better alternative suggestion.
> > 
> > Two weeks have passed. May I ask for an ack so this can go in?
> 
> I’m happy to give you my Ack re the maintainership change, but I’m not 
> qualified to comment on whether it will screw up the get_maintainer script.  
> Perhaps it would be better to send a v2 patch, proposing Daniel Smith as a 
> replacement, to avoid the question of the script entirely.

Maybe we should modify the script so that any sections that don't have
any Maintainer assigned (no M:) fallback into the rest if that's not
the case already?

Thanks, Roger.

Reply via email to