On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> For vendor specific code to support superpages we need to be able to
> deal with a superpage mapping replacing an intermediate page table (or
> hierarchy thereof). Consequently an iommu_alloc_pgtable() counterpart is
> needed to free individual page tables while a domain is still alive.
> Since the freeing needs to be deferred until after a suitable IOTLB
> flush was performed, released page tables get queued for processing by a
> tasklet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
> ---
> I was considering whether to use a softirq-tasklet instead. This would
> have the benefit of avoiding extra scheduling operations, but come with
> the risk of the freeing happening prematurely because of a
> process_pending_softirqs() somewhere.
> ---
> v6: Extend comment on the use of process_pending_softirqs().
> v5: Fix CPU_UP_PREPARE for BIGMEM. Schedule tasklet in CPU_DOWN_FAILED
> when list is not empty. Skip all processing in CPU_DEAD when list is
> empty.
> v4: Change type of iommu_queue_free_pgtable()'s 1st parameter. Re-base.
> v3: Call process_pending_softirqs() from free_queued_pgtables().
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu.h
> @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ void iommu_free_domid(domid_t domid, uns
> int __must_check iommu_free_pgtables(struct domain *d);
> struct domain_iommu;
> struct page_info *__must_check iommu_alloc_pgtable(struct domain_iommu *hd);
> +void iommu_queue_free_pgtable(struct domain_iommu *hd, struct page_info *pg);
>
> #endif /* !__ARCH_X86_IOMMU_H__ */
> /*
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> * this program; If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> */
>
> +#include <xen/cpu.h>
> #include <xen/sched.h>
> #include <xen/iocap.h>
> #include <xen/iommu.h>
> @@ -551,6 +552,103 @@ struct page_info *iommu_alloc_pgtable(st
> return pg;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Intermediate page tables which get replaced by large pages may only be
> + * freed after a suitable IOTLB flush. Hence such pages get queued on a
> + * per-CPU list, with a per-CPU tasklet processing the list on the assumption
> + * that the necessary IOTLB flush will have occurred by the time tasklets get
> + * to run. (List and tasklet being per-CPU has the benefit of accesses not
> + * requiring any locking.)
> + */
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct page_list_head, free_pgt_list);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tasklet, free_pgt_tasklet);
> +
> +static void free_queued_pgtables(void *arg)
I think this is missing a cf_check attribute?
> +{
> + struct page_list_head *list = arg;
> + struct page_info *pg;
> + unsigned int done = 0;
Might be worth adding an:
ASSERT(list == &this_cpu(free_pgt_list));
To make sure tasklets are never executed on the wrong CPU.
Apart form that:
Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <[email protected]>
Thanks, Roger.
