On 07.09.2022 16:33, Julien Grall wrote: > On 25/08/2022 08:17, Jan Beulich wrote: >> I haven't been able to find evidence of "-nopie" ever having been a >> supported compiler option. The correct spelling is "-no-pie". >> Furthermore like "-pie" this is an option which is solely passed to the >> linker. The compiler only recognizes "-fpie" / "-fPIE" / "-fno-pie", and >> it doesn't infer these options from "-pie" / "-no-pie". > > OOI, how did you find out this issue?
By reviewing Andrew's "x86/hvmloader: Don't build as PIC/PIE". >> Add the compiler recognized form, but for the possible case of the >> variable also being used somewhere for linking keep the linker option as >> well (with corrected spelling). >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Julien Grall <[email protected]> Thanks. Jan
